Comments on: Redshift may change over time

By: scordova

scordova — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:22:37 +0000

Please Note:

Salvador

By: Salvador

Salvador — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:56:14 +0000

I know I did not elaborate much on the article, but many times, in the interest of seeing if an article is good or bad, I’ll post it and invite commentary from expert readers. I welcome hearing concerns and criticisms as well as inspiring empirical research.

Scientists have presumed that if one measures a read shift from an object in 1970, that in the year 2007, that red shift should pretty much be the same (after accounting for anticipated changes like the Earth’s position in the solar system, etc.). If it’s not, it’s a major issue! It may not be on the order of light speed changing from 1740 to the present day, but it’s still big news, and the anomaly could be favorable to the YEC position.

By: Salvador

Salvador — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:51:49 +0000

My apologiest to the readers. The I fixed the link, and here is a URL that will work just in case.

http://smartaxes.com/youngcosmos/v1_0/nph-iarticle_query.pdf

Also, as jb said, one can google, and find copies distributed by Harvard for free.

By: jb

jb — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:10:27 +0000

Hm. Looks like they’ve made it difficult to link directly to articles.

Just google this string:

tifft properties of redshift temporal variation harvard

It’s the first hit

By: jb

jb — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:07:27 +0000

Is this the article, maybe:

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ…382..396T

By: benkeshet

benkeshet — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:23:05 +0000

The link seems to be inop, at least for me.

Best Regards