Comments on: Bold prediction of CDK possibly confirmed!!!! http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:02:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: scordova http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-574 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:16:13 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-574 Please Note: <a href=http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/08/06/attention-young-cosmos-has-moved/ rel="nofollow">ATTENTION! YOUNG COSMOS HAS MOVED! </a> Salvador Please Note:

ATTENTION! YOUNG COSMOS HAS MOVED!

Salvador

]]> by: Salvador http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-573 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:22:26 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-573 I'm going to be talking to some researchers. The goal is to have a repository of papers that people feel can be a good theoretical and empirical starting point. A good model is Arxiv.org There are two parts: 1. the authors, editors, and publishers 2. the web admins I could probably set it up myself. I could use help for the web page and website that will host the papers. I don't expect a large volume. Maybe 2 papers a month? regards, Salvador I’m going to be talking to some researchers. The goal is to have a repository of papers that people feel can be a good theoretical and empirical starting point. A good model is Arxiv.org

There are two parts:

1. the authors, editors, and publishers
2. the web admins

I could probably set it up myself. I could use help for the web page and website that will host the papers. I don’t expect a large volume. Maybe 2 papers a month?

regards,
Salvador

]]> by: JGuy http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-572 Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:27:44 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-572 Sal, I'm not sure how one would go about setting up a peer reviewed e-journal. How can I help? Sal,
I’m not sure how one would go about setting up a peer reviewed e-journal. How can I help?

]]> by: Salvador http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-571 Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:50:16 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-571 JGuy, There will be more tests. Unfortunately for now, Dr. Cheesman, Barry and I haven't worked out the details. Dr. Cheesman's calculation, if true and IF [a BIG IF] CDK is true is that the univere is [gasp] not 13,000,000,000 light years across (the meaning of raidus and diameter is a bit flakey because of the non-Euclidean geometries involved), but rather 110,000 light years acorss. Meaning, all the celestial phenomena are packed, and our measurement apparatus is all out of whack. This can be confirmed with improved parallax measurements. We see some hints of this at 300 light years (see the pleiades distance debate), but it will really assert itself with supposed gargantuan distances like the great galaxy Andromeda. Too early to tell! It will probably take a year to uncoil the math into something workable. You're of course welcome to help me set up the electronic peer-reviewed journal to study these issues (hint, hint). Salvador JGuy,

There will be more tests. Unfortunately for now, Dr. Cheesman, Barry and I haven’t worked out the details. Dr. Cheesman’s calculation, if true and IF [a BIG IF] CDK is true is that the univere is [gasp] not 13,000,000,000 light years across (the meaning of raidus and diameter is a bit flakey because of the non-Euclidean geometries involved), but rather 110,000 light years acorss. Meaning, all the celestial phenomena are packed, and our measurement apparatus is all out of whack.

This can be confirmed with improved parallax measurements. We see some hints of this at 300 light years (see the pleiades distance debate), but it will really assert itself with supposed gargantuan distances like the great galaxy Andromeda. Too early to tell!

It will probably take a year to uncoil the math into something workable. You’re of course welcome to help me set up the electronic peer-reviewed journal to study these issues (hint, hint).

Salvador

]]> by: JGuy http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-570 Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:06:39 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-570 Sal, If your find is verified to be true, then congratulations(!!); it would certainly be an excellent discovery of a risky theoretical prediction. To test it further: Could a predictive curve be calculated? And is there enough suitable data to test for a statistically significant fit to such a curve? Sal,
If your find is verified to be true, then congratulations(!!); it would certainly be an excellent discovery of a risky theoretical prediction. To test it further: Could a predictive curve be calculated? And is there enough suitable data to test for a statistically significant fit to such a curve?

]]> by: Jehu. http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-569 Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:28:42 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-569 Great stuff Sal! Keep up the good work. Great stuff Sal! Keep up the good work.

]]> by: Salvador http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-567 Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:28:02 +0000 http://smartaxes.com/blog/2007/07/25/bold-prediction-of-cdk-possibly-confirmed/#comment-567 I have just communicated with the Setterfield's. They are excited over these developments. They are involved in a major project right now and will get back to us. They are delighted with these developments. Many thanks to everyone. I have just communicated with the Setterfield’s. They are excited over these developments. They are involved in a major project right now and will get back to us. They are delighted with these developments.

Many thanks to everyone.

]]>